Are Starbucks Workers Taking Legal Action Against the New Dress Code?

Starbucks workers across three states have launched legal action against the coffee giant, claiming it failed to reimburse them for costs incurred due to a recent dress code change. The lawsuits argue that the new dress code, implemented on 12 May, imposes financial burdens on employees without consent, violating labour laws in Illinois, Colorado, and potentially California.

Last updated: 02 October 2023 (BST)

Key Takeaways

• Starbucks introduced a new dress code requiring specific clothing for all North American employees.
• Workers are filing class-action lawsuits for reimbursement of costs associated with compliance.
• The dress code change is seen as a shift from a previously relaxed policy.
• Legal actions highlight ongoing tensions between Starbucks management and employee unions.
• Allegations suggest a violation of state laws regarding employer reimbursement obligations.

The New Dress Code: What Changed?

Starbucks' new dress code mandates that employees wear solid black shirts, either short or long-sleeved, under their green aprons. While the shirts may or may not have collars, they must adequately cover the midriff and armpits. Additionally, employees must wear khaki, black, or blue denim bottoms without patterns or frayed hems, or solid black dresses that fall no more than four inches above the knee. Footwear must be made from waterproof materials and fall within a specific colour palette.

The dress code also imposes restrictions on visible body modifications. Employees are prohibited from having face tattoos or more than one facial piercing, while tongue piercings and theatrical makeup are also banned. Starbucks stated that the changes were designed to enhance the visibility of the green aprons and foster a more familiar atmosphere for customers.

Employee Reactions and Legal Actions

Employees have expressed frustration over the new dress code, particularly concerning the financial impact of complying with the new guidelines. Brooke Allen, a student working at a Starbucks in Davis, California, shared her experience of having to purchase compliant shoes that cost £60.09 after being told her Crocs were unsuitable. Furthermore, she spent an additional £86.95 on clothing adjustments to meet the dress code.

Allen's sentiment is echoed by many employees who feel that the company is out of touch with their financial realities. "I think it’s extremely tone deaf on the company's part to expect their employees to completely redesign their wardrobe without any compensation," Allen remarked. This sentiment has been a driving force behind the lawsuits filed in state courts in Illinois and Colorado, alongside complaints lodged with California's Labor and Workforce Development Agency.

Legal Framework and Allegations

The legal actions claim that Starbucks is in violation of state labour laws requiring companies to reimburse employees for costs that primarily benefit the employer. For instance, Colorado's labour law prohibits employers from imposing financial burdens on workers without their written consent. The plaintiffs are seeking damages on behalf of all Starbucks workers in these states, regardless of whether their stores are unionised.

Several employees, including Gilbert Cruz from Aurora, Illinois, have reported being denied reimbursement requests from Starbucks. Cruz sought £10 for the cost of removing a nose piercing to comply with the dress code. These experiences highlight the growing dissent among employees regarding the company's policies and practices.

A Shift in Union Tactics

The legal actions reflect a broader movement among Starbucks employees to assert their rights amid ongoing attempts to unionise. Starbucks Workers United, the labour group representing workers, has successfully unionised 640 out of the company's 10,000 U.S.-based stores. They have filed numerous unfair labour practice charges against Starbucks, including a complaint related to the dress code changes in April.

However, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which oversees these complaints, has faced challenges under the previous presidential administration. The firing of an NLRB member by former President Donald Trump has left the board without the quorum necessary to adjudicate cases effectively, complicating the process for workers seeking recourse.

Conclusion: What Lies Ahead

The lawsuits initiated by Starbucks employees over the new dress code exemplify the growing tension between corporate policies and employee rights. As the legal proceedings unfold, they may set significant precedents for labour relations within the coffee industry and beyond. The outcome could influence how employers approach dress codes and employee reimbursements in the future.

As the situation develops, workers and observers alike will be watching closely. Will Starbucks address these grievances effectively, or will further legal action be required? The coming months may bring clarity to a contentious issue that affects not only Starbucks employees but potentially workers across various sectors. #Starbucks #LabourRights #DressCode

FAQs

What is the new dress code for Starbucks employees?

The new dress code requires Starbucks employees to wear solid black shirts under their green aprons and specifies allowances for bottoms and footwear, with restrictions on visible body modifications.

Why are Starbucks employees filing lawsuits?

Employees are filing lawsuits claiming that Starbucks violated state laws by not reimbursing them for the costs incurred in purchasing new clothing to comply with the dress code.

What states are involved in the lawsuits against Starbucks?

The lawsuits have been filed in Illinois and Colorado, with complaints also submitted to California’s Labour and Workforce Development Agency.

What are the implications of the lawsuits for Starbucks?

The lawsuits could set legal precedents regarding employer reimbursement obligations and influence how corporate dress codes are enforced in the future.

How many stores have unionised under Starbucks Workers United?

Currently, Starbucks Workers United has successfully unionised 640 out of Starbucks’ 10,000 company-owned stores in the U.S.

What challenges does the National Labor Relations Board face?

The NLRB has faced challenges under the previous administration, which has affected its capacity to hear and decide upon labour practice cases effectively.